Those who must be kept [entries|friends|calendar]
Just your atypical boy-girl girl-boy

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

The wheel of the year [19 May 2013|12:15am]

minnesattva
We were trying to determine when we did the "5 Bisexuals in a Micra" (as haggis called it, stressing since that there need not be five of them in the future or that they need to all be bisexual) road trip to Jodrell Bank last summer.

"It was after Eurovision," indigopirate. "And before BiCon."

I am delighted at the mental calendar of holidays that this implies.
post comment

Eurovision: long, long prognostication [18 May 2013|04:19pm]

radinden
(Hello. This isn't a return to LJ of any great sort, just the quest for somewhere I can cheerfully drop a few thousand words of nerdery.)

So, Eurovision. I had to catch up the two semi-finals after the fact, thanks to some deeply inconveniently-timed work travel. However, that meant I actually bothered to watch the videos beforehand, and could also go through the semis knowing who had qualified.

Two things immediately struck me about the semis. First, this is a crazily strong year for both songs and singers: the plethora of television talent shows across Europe means that there's now a large fund of singers who can carry a tough tune on a big occasion, which has in turn allowed some very ambitious and professional vocal numbers. This has certainly been the year in particular of the big crashing young female singers, hammering out either soaring pop ballads or dance numbers (or indeed hybrids of the two). Bit of a shame, therefore, that the UK missed the memo, and sent a rather older crashing female singer with a ditchwater-dull ballad… but I'm getting ahead of myself.

The second thing is how well-staged the shows have been. I know Sweden gets a lot of practice at this each year with the Melodifestivalen, one leg of which this year was indeed in Malmo, but the lighting, sound, effects and camerawork were really sharp, giving visual options that meant songs didn't mostly need to resort to gimmicks to catch the eye. BBC Three also did a really nice job of presenting the semis: I really liked Scott Mills and Ana Matronic pairing up on the commentary, and will actually be disappointed to have that simpering Norton fool tonight instead.

But anyway, I've already been asked for my 'expert' (ha!) predictions for the final. It's worth noting the blindingly obvious as to the absences here, however: between Turkey's withdrawal from the contest, the Balkan blow-out in the semis (of the 13 songs eliminated, six were the former Yugoslav states (Serbia… whuh?!) and Albania - and Bosnia-Herzegovina withdrew as well), and Greece not being able to twelve points in the final to Cyprus (also out, slightly to my surprise with that song), there's an awful lot of stray eight-, ten- and twelve-point scores available that would otherwise be automatically spoken for. Likewise, although the Nordic countries are all strong, they'll be splitting their friendly votes between them. So this could also be the most open contest in a long time, despite the hot favourite in the betting - and I wouldn't be at all surprised if the eventual winner were currently sitting at 50-1 or more, allowing some lucky folks to make a right killing. Much will therefore come down to the running order, and the performance on the night.

But anyway, here's my song-by-song notes for the final, in running order:

1. France: Oh dear, this is just too good a song to be first in the order. Staging could save it, perhaps - we haven't seen it yet - but what could have been memorable in position twenty-something is going to be forgettable first out on the stage. No wonder it's bouncing along the bottom of the betting.

2. Lithuania: Ah, the dreaded second place in the running order! I reckon this was actually a bit lucky to get through the semi-final - perhaps the gender balance worked in this chap's favour? But unless gender works for it again, I found this all a bit pedestrian and blessed with some odd lyrics, and the 200-1 betting seems justified.

3. Moldova: I like this song, and it's well-performed and well-staged, but it's just not nearly exciting enough to survive being this early in a high-octane field, I think. Had it a hummable hook or a great big chorus, I'd perhaps rate it higher, but I reckon mid-table is where this will end up.

4. Finland: Oh myyyyyyy. There's nothing you can say about this that hasn't already been said: lyrics that are a bit on the dodgy side, staging and performance that would guarantee a booking at G.A.Y., gimmickry galore, and a hefty splash of politics to boot. There's been many tracks like this in the past that have savagely split the voting (Iceland's been a frequent contributor on this front, I think) between the countries that adore big, kitsch numbers (usually northern / western and liberal) and those that either don't understand or can't stand them (usually eastern / southern and more conservative). As it is, I can see this picking up a whole bunch of high scores in places, and then failing to feature in others. We won't forget it, but I can't see its winning.

5. Spain: As m'dear lady pointed out, this is "My Lovely Horse" in disguise, right down to the equine theme of the video. It sounds like it's been stolen from Ireland circa 1995, and despite otherwise being a fairly decent effort it's all a bit lightweight in this field and isn't misplaced at the foot of the betting.

6. Belgium: He's an odd-looking chap, isn't he? Strong song, however - much better than Ireland's later on - but the staging's a bit odd. That said, it's the best that's come from the Francophone half of Belgium for an awfully long time, and it would thoroughly deserve a decent top-half finish. Could it win? Maybe - and at 100-1 it's got a good return on it if it does. It's certainly the one that keeps getting stuck in my head more than any other.

7. Estonia: I'm astounded that this seems to be sitting around 150-1 in the betting: yes, it's yet another crashing great ballad from a young female singer, but it's exquisitely executed and has a fairly generous position in the draw in a run of fairly upbeat numbers. If it wasn't quite so similar to other entries, I'd rank this as one of my picks, but I suspect it's going to suffer from being sung in Estonian (18 of the 26 songs in the final are in English). Nonetheless, I like it a lot - possibly my favourite in this year's contest.

8. Belarus: Well, it's better than their efforts for the last few years, with some pretty glitzy staging and that sort of south-eastern European meets Latin pop sound that's done well at Eurovision in the past. However, it's got two problems: first, the singer didn't seem all that confident of her notes; and second, it's from Belarus. If Turkey had entered, borrowed this song, and given it to a stronger singer, I'd be backing it to win - but otherwise three figures in the betting markets seem justified.

9. Malta: Jeremy in IT and his risk assessments, huh? This is perhaps what Spain were aiming at, but missed. On the other hand, this is a pretty winsome affair, and quite refreshingly lo-fi in a year of somewhat overproduced monsters. I don't think it's a winner - this is Malta we're talking about, after all, and they specialise in snatching defeat from the jaws of Eurovision victory - but I could see this doing well.

10. Russia: Oh, this is another inch-perfect female ballad: an utter embarras de richesses on that front this year, but this one's brilliantly executed. A bit later in the draw and I'd really back this, but I fear it's going to be forgotten in the middle of the order - but it deserves its strong backing in the betting nonetheless. Actually surprised to find that it's not written by one of Nashville's finest, by the way.

11. Germany: Well, they're famous, which is in their favour, but it's not even the best song Cascada's done. In a year of big female-sung dance numbers, I don't think this is anywhere near the strongest and really doesn't have a chance - but then again I don't know quite how much they'll get on name recognition alone.

12. Armenia: I would ask rhetorically "how did this manage to qualify?", but I know the answer already: Armenia's diaspora is always good for a healthy number of points. It's a grotty mess of a song, however: it's got something of 1980s poodles with guitars about it, but the lyrics are just so rottenly awful and the singing so much like a cat drowning in mud, that I can't even bring myself to mock the bad dress sense. I would love if the betting - somewhere between 200-1 and 400-1 - might give this a risk of nul points, but sadly that just won't happen.

13. Netherlands: I'm still not sure whether the opening of this was supposed to sound quite so strangely pitched in the semi-final or not - but I didn't find this at all interesting and didn't even expect it to make the final. That said, an awful lot of other people who know what they're talking about seem to like it, and the saving grace for this might be that several Balkan tracks a bit like this have done well in the past ("Molitva", anyone?), with a bucketload of Balkan votes looking for a home. Nonetheless, possibly a case of "too good for Eurovision"?

14. Romania: On the standardised scale of campness (100 Liberaces make one Elton), this is hovering somewhere around two kiloEltons. I have no idea how it got through, because for all the crackers gimmickry, semi-naked men, demented shrieking, and lunatic staging, this is bloody awful. Really, truly, spectacularly awful. Between this and what comes next, this is my cue for tonight's tea break.

15. United Kingdom: Now, we haven't seen how they're going to stage this yet, and that nice Ms Tyler's got a pedigree and perhaps a certain residual sympathy across Europe, but it's just not doing it for me. Frankly, we're permanently five years or so behind the curve with Eurovision, and this looks just a bit out of date in the way that a lot of the new countries entering Eurovision for the first time a decade or so ago did.

16. Sweden: This won't do badly - Sweden never does badly, really - but it's a rather odd track and not very immediate. A run through the semi-finals might have helped this build up some support, actually, just as it did in the Melodifestivalen, but unless they've managed to use their own staging really to their advantage, I don't know how this can really stick in the mind. 66-1 or thereabouts seems stingy, really.

17. Hungary: This was so much better in the video: was the singer suffering from a cold or even nerves in the semi-final? It's another pretty little ditty, but perhaps just a bit too gentle for much more than a brief breather between two high-octane numbers. Shame, because it's sweet, but this could be heading for the bottom of the pile simply because it's going to get utterly overlooked.

18. Denmark: It's not hard to see why this is the hot favourite: cracking song and jaw-dropping staging in the semi-final. That said, that sort of support (and indeed the local support in the hall) can count against a song in the televoting, and the song makes demands on the top of the singer's register that she only just met in the semi. I'd joined the crowd tipping this before the week started, but I'm not so sure now: there's a lot of big songs by female singers here, and I don't think this one actually stands out as much as everyone thinks - but I'm just as likely to be wrong about that! I wouldn't bet against it, though.

19. Iceland: Pretty enough, but a bit forgettable. Uh. That's it, really. Another one that might be risking the wooden spoon thanks to an unhelpful draw position.

20. Azerbaijan: Would it be a bit uncharitable to describe this as bog-standard boy band as songs go? The staging's clever, though (Crystal Maze jokes aside), and there'll be votes from those swayed by pretty male singers. That said, I can't see how it quite justifies such short odds.

21. Greece: It's mad. It's got something of the Moldovan gnomes a few years back about it, but I fear this could be a bit of a one-joke wonder: funny in the semi-final, but a bit tiresome the second time. That said, it's going to get a bunch of joke votes just for its title, and may benefit from the south-east Europe wipeout. Don't count it out.

22. Ukraine: This is just a bit boring, I'm afraid, and you can rather tell from the gimmickry in staging (bring on the giant!) that they perhaps know it. It sounded a lot better in the video, but live this just came across as quite screechy. This would normally be a plum place in the running order, as well, but the surrounding acts could really leave this adrift. All told, I reckon you'd be wasting your money at 10-1 on this. Wait for me to look an idiot with that prediction, though.

23: Italy: It's a classy song, by about the best male singer for the night, and it's at the right point in the night for a bit of class, so I wouldn't write it off. But then again, Italy have found in the last couple of years since they returned to the contest that they can secure a decent finish by sending the San Remo winner, but it's all just a bit too good to win. Not a bad shout around the 25-1 mark, though.

24. Norway: Leaving aside the slightly awkward title, this is a magnificent track, with production values right up there with the glossiest top ten hits. The singer's more than equal to it, and has already a good career track record, although I'm surprise to find very little evidence of this track having done much in the charts across Europe yet. However, the staging is very reliant on the lighting and camera wizardry - a girl standing still in a white dress being pretty much the Eurovision default this year - and (having listened to this a few times) you need decent sound quality to appreciate the mixing. That said, I can see this raking in jury votes galore, and it's got to have a good chance.

25. Georgia: It's a slightly desperate trick to buy in the writer of the previous year's winning song, and I'm afraid that this has "song written to order" written all over it: it's a Eurovision-by-numbers, production-so-glossy-you-can-see-your-face-in-it, dramatic-key-changing, Disney-theme-song instant, rip-off of Andrew Lloyd Webber. But that sort of thing does well at Eurovision, as the noble Lord himself proved the last time the UK scored more than a dribble of points. I hope it doesn't win, but there's a risk.

26. Ireland: At least it's not Jedward! It's got prime spot in the running order, and its odds have shortened massively accordingly - and it's also another of the endangered males in the field. That said, I don't actually like this myself: the singer's dreadfully nasal and screechy (and not always on key?), and for all the over-the-top staging and production, the song underneath is instantly forgettable. It's not going to do badly, but it's not going to win (he said confidently and foolishly).

So if I were a betting man? Denmark's a waste of money at those odds, but deservedly a strong favourite nonetheless. Norway's also a bit short on the return for any cash, but has hit the running order jackpot. The Finnish insanity's fun, but unlike Lordi seven years ago it's far too early in the night to benefit from drunken amusement value, and a repeat of the whole girl-kissing thing could really lose votes in more conservative countries. The insanity factor is something which could benefit Greece, however, but I can't see them getting enough support to win. Russia, Ukraine, Estonia and all the other great big female ballads could just cancel each other out - any one of them perhaps having had a much better chance any other year, and they're all strong songs - while I would perhaps pick Belgium as the potential complete outsider surprise. But neck on the line: Norway and Denmark neck-and-neck, with Norway to nick it thanks to running order, ahead of Netherlands and perhaps Belgium.

There, that's guaranteed I'll look a fool!
2 comments|post comment

“I guess if you were interested in crazy people this is the book for you.” [18 May 2013|09:52am]

minnesattva
This is for Andrew, who often gets very upset, stressed and frustrated at bad reviews of his books on Amazon (not least because they're often factually incorrect or say nothing but that the viewer has totally missed the point of the book).

The masses are asses, as my American politics teacher used to say. It's always a bad idea to put your self-esteem in the hands of these people.

I can't decide what I like the best.

There's the irate grandmother who thinks that the Narnia books are "nothing more than advertisements for “Turkish Delight,” a candy popular in the U.K. The whole point of buying books for my grandkids was to give them a break from advertising, and here (throughout) are ads for this “Turkish Delight”! How much money is this Mr. Lewis getting from the Cadbury’s chocolate company anyway? This man must be laughing to the bank."

There's a couple I actually agree with (“The book is not readable because of the overuse of adverbs” about Lord of the Rings, and one that really isn't very nice at all about Virginia Woolf, who I feel bad for disliking so because I think it's just due to a terrible English professor I had, but I haven't been able to bring myself to try reading again since.)

There's two Andrew agrees with, “So many other good books…don’t waste your time on this one. J.D. Salinger went into hiding because he was embarrassed” and he actually applauded after I read the one for On the Road.

“It grieves me deeply that we Americans should take as our classic a book that is no more than a lengthy description of the doings of fops” is a very good point, actually.

The person who wrote sentences like "The distinction is entirely illusory" but still thinks no book is any better than another and Harry Potter's better than 1984 baffles me.

I think Steinbeck wouldn't necessarily have minded a review like “While the story did have a great moral to go along with it, it was about dirt! Dirt and migrating. Dirt and migrating and more dirt.”

“I’m a Steely Dan fan so naturally I wanted to read the book they thought compelling enough to name their band after an element of” made us both laugh until I thought I might be sick.

And though I haven't read The Sound and the Fury, I have read a lot of books for which “This book is like an ungrateful girlfriend. You do your best to understand her and get nothing back in return” would seem an apt description.
2 comments|post comment

Milestones in geekery [17 May 2013|05:57pm]

minnesattva
It must say something about me that I now can't help but spot Nick Briggs' voice at twenty paces.* Probably something concerning.

* Actually, only across a room, but with headphones on listening to TMS.
post comment

A response: why the ‘Labour for an EU Referendum’ campaign is crucial now [17 May 2013|10:30am]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/17/a-response-why-the-labour-for-an-eu-referendum-campaign-is-crucial-now/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37306

by Dominic Moffitt

Firstly, I’d like to thank Sunny, for saying that the campaign for Labour to support an EU referendum is “cool”.

He’s right; out of all the groups calling for the Labour Party to support a policy launched this week, Labour for a Referendum is the most in vogue.

However, on the main crux of his article, that our campaign is “Dead on Arrival”, we would have to, somewhat controversially, disagree.

Sunny outlines three main points for his argument. I will try and rebut each of these points as thoroughly, fairly and, crucially, quickly as possible.

1) Supporting a referendum would make Eurosceptic Tory backbenchers more demanding.

I don’t see this as being Ed Miliband’s problem. If Labour supported a referendum one suspects that Tory MPs would attempt to push their own leader into a more hardline position rather than ours.

Sure, Tory backbenchers might become more demanding, but that would only lead them to more internal bickering, rather than dividing our party?

2) You shouldn’t get involved when your opponents are infighting.

The idea that we should adopt a grab-the-popcorn approach to opposition and let the victory come to us seems flawed. While it makes perfect sense not to rush into policy commitments so far before the election, when we see the Tories in disarray we should capitalise on it as best we can.

Milk that subject for all it’s worth. Grab it and run. Put a spanner in the works. Use whatever metaphor you want, but sitting back and relaxing is easy, but it is no path to a Labour majority.

3) Labour’s line is settled, we can’t go back on it now.

We’re not expecting to change Labour’s policy by the end of the week. That’s not the plan. What we want is for a commitment to an EU referendum to be in our 2015 manifesto. We think it’s the right thing to do, we think it’s popular and we think it will help get Ed Miliband in 10 Downing Street.

But we’re happy to play the long game. 2017 is indeed “far, far away”, although it is likely/definitely going to be half as far away when we go into the next election. Everything Miliband has said about it so far has been couched in language that suggests that this is a policy liable to change if circumstances do.

Our job, as Labour for a Referendum, is to make sure that the pressure is kept on, and that Miliband knows just how helpful a pledge could be.

Finally, I can only apologise that Labour for a Referendum did not exist a year ago. Circumstances changed.


Dominic Moffitt is Campaign Director for Labour for a Referendum

post comment

Where I'm from [17 May 2013|11:22am]

minnesattva
"So what part of Minnesota are you from then?" Andrew's American friend asked me last night.

What an awesome thing that is to hear. I never get asked that any more, because I so rarely run into anyone who's even heard of Minnesota that I don't usually get to refine my birthplace any more than what part of the country I'm from. And even there the answer I've found most effective is "in the middle, at the top" when people ask where in America I'm from; anything more specific gets blank stares.
13 comments|post comment

Cameron’s gambit over the EU Referendum backfires anyway [17 May 2013|10:20am]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/17/camerons-gambit-over-the-eu-referendum-backfires-anyway/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37300

If David Cameron expected voters to respect him for firming up his commitment to a referendum on the European Union, YouGov’s latest polling for The Times will disappoint him.

Most Britons, including a majority of those who voted Conservative in 2010, think he is acting out of tactical calculation rather than because he feels deeply about the issue.

That’s the copnclusion offered by Peter Kellner today.

And this chart shows it.

Peter Kellner adds:

Voters, and especially floating voters, tend to decide which party to support on character more than policy. Parties and their leaders attract more support if they are regarded as principled and competent. If they are thought to be driven by tactics rather than belief, they risk being seen as weak and losing respect and votes.

That is the risk that Cameron now faces over Europe. He could end up losing more votes by appearing unprincipled than he gains from adopting a stance on the EU that appears to be closer to the public mood. In contrast, the popularity of UKIP and Farage is being driven not just by his stance on the EU, but also by respect for being thought to restore principles to politics

Ouch!

This entire EU Referendum episode has been a disaster for Cameron.

post comment

Greek MP shouts ‘Heil Hitler’ in Parliament [17 May 2013|09:59am]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/17/greek-golden-dawn-mp-shouts-heil-hitler-in-parliament/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37301

An MP for the ultra-right Golden Dawn party was ejected from Parliament today he shouted Heil Hitler during session.

Panayiotis Iliopoulos condemned fellow MPs as ‘wretched sell-outs’ and ‘goats’, swearing as other Golden Dawn MPs also walked out.

At the :36 mark in this video you can hear a member of the party shout “Heil Hitler.”

via ekathimerini.com

post comment

Big Thanks To All [16 May 2013|05:20pm]

davesmusictank
As you can guess, I didn't do much today - after all the beers last night watching Chelsea win another trophy and then having a few beers ,some wine and a couple of whiskies up the pub, I didn't wake up till at least midday.

Thanks to everybody who sent me wishes and plaudits. Tomorrow with renewed energy I shall be out and about going to Tonbridge and Bromley.
post comment

Ed Miliband slams Google for tax avoidance [16 May 2013|02:11pm]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/16/ed-miliband-slams-google-for-tax-avoidance/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37298

Ed Miliband MP, Leader of the Labour Party, speaking today on the rising cost of living and companies paying their fair share, said:

People will be shocked by the evidence that Google is going to extraordinary lengths to avoid paying their fair share of tax.

It comes on top of other firms apparently engaging in similar practices.

It is evidence of a culture of corporate irresponsibility among certain firms which is totally unacceptable.

And of course we have now seen allegations about petrol fixing as well.

It comes at a time when ordinary families are seeing services cut, their taxes rising and so many businesses are struggling to make ends meet and are actually doing the right thing and paying their fair share of taxes.

As so often under this Government, I think it is evidence of one rule for those at the top and another rule for everyone else.

David Cameron says we have to just wait for international action. He is wrong.

post comment

The ‘Labour 4 for an EU Referendum’ campaign is finished. Dead on Arrival. [16 May 2013|12:37pm]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/16/the-labour-4-for-an-eu-referendum-campaign-is-finished-dead-on-arrival/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37294

I was running my own campaign calling for Labour to offer an EU Referendum before it became cool. But now, given all the renewed focus on this question, a group of Labour folks have set up a Labour for a referendum campaign.

Unfortunately, it is Dead on Arrival. Finished. The chances succeeding now are very near zero.

And there are very simple reasons for this.

1) Mad Euro-sceptic Tories have shown that once you feed the beast it only grows and gets more demanding. So Ed Miliband will not want to feed it at all.

2) When your opponents are in chaos and fighting against each other, why wade in too? It is much better for Ed Miliband to let the Tories carry on making a fool out of themselves. It’s not like the EU Referendum is going to come at an earlier date just because Tory backbenchers want it so.

3) The Labour leadership have settled on a position now: committing to a referendum now would only lead to more uncertainty over the UK’s relationship with Europe, given 2017 is so far away. It makes no sense to junk that position at now.

I was told by a senior shadow cabinet member, over a year ago, that at one point all three parties were negotiating a joint position on offering an EU Referendum. At that point I was optimistic that it would be in Labour’s next manifesto or materialise as a commitment even earlier.

But for some reason the negotiations broke down and the three parties could not agree on jointly offering an EU Referendum. And so everyone went their separate ways.

A more coordinated campaign to get Labour to agree to a referendum should have been launched over a year ago. At this stage, mostly thanks to the antics of the Tory right, there is no chance the Labour leadership will entertain the idea now.

post comment

Why Nadine Dorries is so eager to go into an alliance with UKIP [16 May 2013|08:30am]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/16/why-nadine-dorries-is-so-eager-to-go-into-an-alliance-with-ukip/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37292

You would normally expect an MP who has only just had their party whip reinstated after a six month suspension to lie low for a while but not Nadine Dorries. She wants an alliance with UKIP.

But thy is Dorries even talking about the possibility of running on a joint Tory/UKIP ticket?

Well, the answer almost certainly lies in this recent YouGov poll:

New YouGov research conducted just before her party membership was reinstated reveals that 43% of Tories would have supported the party’s decision to reinstate her, while 45% think she should not be allowed to rejoin the party.

That’s right, more Tory voters would rather have seen Dorries left out in the cold than were happy to see her readmitted to the party and the figures amongst UKIP voters are not that much better:

The poll also suggests many UKIP voters may be relieved the Conservative Party took Dorries back. 35% of UKIP supporters think their party would be less credible if Nadine Dorries were to join it, compared to only 7% who think it would be more credible.

Oh dear…

Even allowing for UKIP recent performance in the local elections and expectations that it will perform extremely well in next year’s European elections, one would not normally expect to see a self-styled Eurosceptic MP in a historically very safe Tory seat sweating over the possibility of UKIP running a candidate against them at the next general election.

If nothing else, the majority of incumbent Tory Eurosceptics have a personal vote and a track record to call upon that means that’s unlikely that they local electorate will seek to punish them for what they perceive to be Cameron’s follies but Dorries is not in anything like that position thanks to her own past conduct – and I’m not just talking here about her skipping out her constituents for more than three weeks to appear on “I’m a Celebrity…”.

There’s also the little matter of her using her personal ‘blog’ to mislead her own constituents as to the actual location of her main home, while claiming for her constituency home on expenses, her habitual use of her own parliamentary office as a job creation scheme for her own daughter and, of course, the ongoing investigation by IPSA into expenses claimed since the last general election for the rental of flat in Pimlico that, as I revealed last week, she used overnight for a total of just 25 nights in the whole of 2012 while, at the same time, claiming just over £4,000 to cover the costs of make a daily commute to Westminster from her constituency home, and back, eighty-six times.

The full figures are, I think, well worth repeating:

ND IG2

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out, based on YouGov’s polling and her own track record, why Dorries is talking up the idea of trying run on an joint Tory/UKIP ticket.

It’s not that she fears that a UKIP candidate in her constituency will be able to exploit Tory divisions over Europe but rather that by running on anti-politics ticket, UKIP may very well be in a position to exploit her own personal unpopularity amongst her Tory voters and her dubious track record on expenses to, at the very least, take a sizeable chunk out of her majority, if not pose a serious threat of unseating her.

This is not about confusion amongst members of her own constituency association, it’s purely about trying to keep UKIP out of her constituency in the interests of self-preservation and not losing her main taxpayer-funded meal ticket.

She is, as Margaret Thatcher might have put it, ‘Frit’.

post comment

Star Trek: Adventures in the Incompetent Public Sector [16 May 2013|10:40am]

kerrypolka
I think my favourite thing about the new Star Trek movies is how canonically shit Starfleet is.

Spoilers for Star Trek: INTO DORKNESSCollapse )

This entry is crossposted to Dreamwidth. comment count unavailable comments there.
5 comments|post comment

Italy in photos: part 1 - Rome [16 May 2013|12:21am]

ruudboy
So, it was lateish on the Saturday by the time we'd checked in to the hotel, so we just went and ate nearby. Therefore, I'm counting Sunday as:

Day 1

We wandered into the city down to Piazza Venezia, where there's a big old monument to Victor Emmanuel II, who was somehow the first king of Italy, making one wonder what happened to Victor Emmanuel I. It's also surrounded by ancient bits.

DSCF1519

Victor Emmanuel II monument and Trajan's column


DSCF1535

Temple of Mars in the Forum of Augustus

DSCF1534

View of Trajan's Forum

DSCF1521

There were lots of lizards basking on the ancient monuments


We then wandered down past the Colosseum to the site of the Circus Maximus:

DSCF1536

and stopped to get some lunch, after which we wandered up the Capitoline Hill to look at the Roman Forum:

DSCF1539

before heading back to the hotel via the Spanish Steps:

DSCF1547


Day 2

The next morning we got up, and our first stop was the Torre Argentina cat sanctuary, where cats live amongst the ancient temple ruins.

DSCF1559 DSCF1561

DSCF1564 DSCF1563

DSCF1566 DSCF1568

After this, we wandered through the narrow streets to the magnificent Piazza Navona:

DSCF1569

where we ate lunch looking at the caricature artists' displays:

DSCF1579

Is that Ben Elton.

Then back to the hotel for a bit of a rest away from the insane heat, and then out again to go and look at the Vatican. Here's St Peter's Square:

DSCF1592

and nearby, Castel Sant' Angelo:

DSCF1608

Day 3

Colosseum!

DSCF1610

DSCF1616

DSCF1620

DSCF1625

DSCF1627


The Colosseum is cool, basically.


To follow: Part 2 - Sorrento.
1 comment|post comment

Fanfic Idea [15 May 2013|07:33pm]

huskyteer
[ mood | silly ]

The Aristocats meets Back to the Future. Thomas O'Malley was the kittens' father all along, but unless they can use the power of jazz to get their future parents together, Berlioz, Toulouse and Marie will cease to exist!

...no?

5 comments|post comment

Beers Ready, Bring On The Football [15 May 2013|07:05pm]

davesmusictank
Picture 414

I am ready now for the evening, three top bottle ales to drink , Ridleys Old Bob (5.1 % ABV), Wychwood Hobgoblin (5.2 % ABV) and Green King IPA Reserve (5.4 % ABV).

All yummy beers to watch football on TV. Chelsea V Benfica, and later the pub.
1 comment|post comment

Why doesn’t the left think more about how to shift public opinion? [15 May 2013|12:26pm]
liberalconsp

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/05/15/why-doesnt-the-left-think-more-about-how-to-shift-public-opinion/

http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=37288

What function do, or should, left-wing parties serve? I ask this old question because of a paper which Jon has drawn my attention to.

Peter Taylor-Gooby points out that, as inequality has risen, attitudes towards the poor and benefit recipients have hardened. He suggests several longer-term reasons for this, among them the decline of class alignment and rise of individualism. I'd add three other factors:

- A mistaken factual base. The public under-estimate bosses' pay and over-estimate welfare benefits.

- Recessions usually make people more mean-spirited.

- Capitalism generates cognitive biases (ideologies) that result in hostility to welfare recipients.

As Taylor-Goody says, it doesn't need to be this way: "Alternative approaches that emphasise reciprocity, solidarity and inclusion are possible."

This poses the question: how do we get to such approaches from where we are? One possibility is to look to a leftist party to argue for them. But there are good reasons to expect the Labour party not to do this. Just as companies' marketing strategies rarely work by telling potential customers they are stupid, so political campaigns rarely do so. This is why Labour panders to some of the worst aspects of public opinion, on immigration or welfare, rather than outrightly opposes it. The Labour party is a managerialist marketing strategy, not a force for truth and justice.

But if Labour is not an agency for radical change, what is? Sure, there are a few bloggers and columnists who are trying to shift the Overton window, but these tend to preach to smallish groups of the already-converted.

This, of course, is not to deny that social attitudes can change. For example, during my lifetime, attitudes to gays has improved considerably. But I fear that this progress has been like Max Planck's view of scientific advance – it has happened one funeral at a time.

And herein lies a paradox of the left. Whilst we have spent decades advocating social change, we have remarkably few answers to the question: through what mechanisms, exactly, can it be achieved?

post comment

A Quick Visit (or the Faversham Formulation) [15 May 2013|04:00pm]

davesmusictank
[ mood | energetic ]

Popped into Sittingbourne to do another mystery shop visit. Picked up some books, a shirt and an accessory item. I then went to Morrisons to get some bottle beers for myself and some lager for Tim for the game tonight , Chelsea v Benfica. Also chillies and peas for a meal before the game and then to the Office to pay my travel and back - I know - in the Office on my birthday.

Afterwards i went over to Faversham to do the other mystery shop at the second Cancer Research shop in West Street.

Picture 413

These are the books from today's visits -

Doris Lessing - The Fifth Child (Flamingo)
Khaled Hosseini - The Kite Runner (Bloomsbury)
Peter Conradi - Iris Murdoch , A Life (Harper Collins)
Chuck Palahniuk - Fight Club (Vintage)
Meg Rosoff - How I Live Now (Penguin)
Meera Syal - Life Isn't All Tee Hee (Anchor)
The Penguin Dictionary of Science (Penguin)


Tonight Chelsea play Benfica - they should win tonight but the Portuguese are the underdogs this time around..

post comment

Love Is the Law [15 May 2013|08:53am]

minnesattva
There are so many things I should be doing now. I should be working on that thing I was talking about yesterday. I should be sorting out the spare room so someone can actually sleep in it tomorrow night. I need to get ready for work and leave the house soon.

But instead I keep looking at MPR's photos from the signing of Minnesota's same-sex marriage bill yesterday.

Minnesota's old, white, male governor gives a thumbs-up after signing the bill.

Not for the official pomp and circumstance so much, though, as the people in the crowd.

Two men sit close together on the grass, facing each other, hands on each other's thighs, with a little bit of space between them and the standing crowds around them, a lovely intimate moment in such a public place.



I love this picture especially, because the two guys here, one smiling while the other kisses his forehead, look so normal to me. They could be neighbors or friends of my parents. But my parents probably think that all queer people are like the person standing to the right of the picture: young, arm covered in tattoos and wearing a hipster bow tie. Maybe that one's not gay but they're some kinda weirdo, not like these guys with potbellies and greying beards.

And just in case I was in any doubt that this is Minnesota...



A man holding a little white dog who is wearing both a rainbow lei around its neck and a teeny Twins cap.

I love you so much, Minnesota.
7 comments|post comment

The Hythe Hypothesis [15 May 2013|08:29am]

davesmusictank
[ mood | content ]

On the bus back from my two visits in Faversham and Hythe I found that we had an unexpected detour due to the A2 road being blocked both carriageways near Bridge. It took us via Wingham and through Littlebourne to Canterbury. Littlebourne was where Tim had his pub.

The connecting bus to Faversham had a gent marking a heavy print out. It looked like a Ph.D. thesis and he was marking it with a pink highlight pen, and occasionally writing on it with a red Biro. I thought how can anyone write on a bus that is moving Then again, I have this little Moleskin notebook That I put jottings in and I too was scribbling away in it. In it I put my thoughts, ideas or plots if I were to write a book – fat chance.

I picked up four books and a pair of trousers for five quid from the Cancer Research shop in Preston Street,Faversham. No books on science, mostly novels and a biography of Humphrey Bogart.

In Hythe it was an Iceland store visit in which I purchased much needed spread and bread.

Today, for my birthday, I will be going to Sittingbourne to do a couple of visits, and may purchase some beers from Morrisons. I presume I will invited to the local pub this evening, and I was going to eat out, so I might defer that to another day.

post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]