... and if you believe all of that you're a bigger fool than me [entries|friends|calendar]
Just your atypical boy-girl girl-boy

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

[03 Jul 2010|01:18pm]
Hello. This journal is now largely friends-only. If you've just added me and would like to be added back, please leave a comment so I know.

-x-
post comment

[21 Jun 2009|12:25am]
Poll #1418730
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Adam's really great; Joe is wonderful. Joe is really really really brilliant. They're fantastic! But which one is the best?

View Answers

It's Adam
11 (61.1%)

It's Joe
7 (38.9%)



-x-
9 comments|post comment

Blog of the week [09 Apr 2009|02:22pm]
This week's Blog of the Week has been written by Andrew Brown at Comment is Free.

The background to the story is that the National Secular Society (NSS) made some FOI requests and discovered that hospital chaplains are being paid for by the NHS. They estimate that some £40m is spent annually. The NSS suggests that money would be better spent on things like doctors and nurses and medicine. They recognise that many people value the work of hospital chaplains, but they argue that they should be paid for by the churches (which are pretty wealthy as it is), rather than by the state.

Lib Dem MP Evan Harris (whose eyes are just slightly too big for his head), honorary associate of the NSS, was on BBC breakfast earlier this week making the point that the chaplains perform a vital service for many and that he has no problem with them working in hopitals and speaking to those who want to speak to them, but he just doesn't see why the state should be funding them. It's a perfectly cogent argument, in my view.

Now, step forward Andrew Brown

The wonderful thing about the atheist movement in this country is that it shows how all the vices that made religion repulsive can flourish in the complete absence of supernatural belief. The fruits of the movement are hypocrisy, humourlessness, meanness of spirit and triumphalist ignorance, all in the service of a determination that no one anywhere shall enjoy any pleasure or thought that is not approved by them...

...only those consolations of which [The NSS] approves should be permitted on taxpayers' money. And it's obvious that if the group got its way, its next demand would be for the abolition of all chaplaincy services, however funded.

This kind of secularism has nothing to do with evidence or rationality, of course.


Unlike Mr Brown's rational and evidence-based argument that it's "obvious" the NSS is arguing for the abolition of chaplains altogether.

-x-
1 comment|post comment

[23 Mar 2009|11:46am]
Peterborough then. There were 27 players, split into three groups of nine. Each group played a round-robin (nine rounds, eight games each and one sit ) after which the top three were promoted, and the bottom three were relegated. Then another round robin followed by promotion/relegation, then one final round robin. I started in the middle group. Those of you who know [info]don_donkey might like to know that he was also there, playing in his first ever tournament. [info]obsessive_katy came along too, taking photos and generally documenting the event and our descent into mania.

I don't think it would be particularly interesting (even for me) if I went through the minutiae of every single game on here. At some point in the weekend, I had hoped to get promoted into the top division, where the only Brit to have ever won the World Championship was playing. Unfortunately, I got off to an appalling start to the tournament. After five games, my record was 1-4. Every Scrabble player moans about bad luck with the tiles, but I'd managed just two blanks in five games (out of a possible ten). In one game I'd played the vowel-dumping move AIA, had picked AAI from the bag, played AIA to get rid of them again, and picked EEI. I was staring relegation in the face, and would have to win my next three games to have any chance of staying up. If I was relegated after the first RR, there would be no chance of getting into the top group. Going a bonus down in the next game wasn't great, but I could hit back right away with URINALS (75). I then blocked and blocked, forcing my opponent to open up the board if he wanted to win. As soon as he did, I put down ETESIaN (70). In game seven the tiles finally started to run for me with TINDERS (63), BOXIEr (66) and EDUCaTE (74). Going into the last game of the first RR I had to win to stay up. I changed five consonants on my first turn but was able to play SNARLIER (59) right after as a result. My opponenet hit back with PLOTTERs (70) but after another change I had MALIGnS for 86. I was about 30 ahead, and the unseen X represented the only real scoring opportunity. I blocked all the most lucrative spots where it would go and, inevitably, then picked it myself. My opponent's time was running right down though, and I was able to play slowly and carefully to record a scratchy 385-352 win. I finished sixth out of the nine players with a 4-4 record, and therefore just stayed in division B.

After a break for dinner we started the second RR at about 10pm. The organiser had warned us that this was when we'd start feeling ropey. The first game was against a player who had been relegated from the top division. I came close, but it was another defeat. But then things started to turn around. I still wasn't getting the blanks, I was still getting hideous unbalanced racks, but I was able to play through them, winning the next five games in a row. If only all tournaments could be played in the middle of the night. A defeat against the top-rated player in the group then left me at 5-2. As the sun started to come up, I would still need to win the final game to ensure promotion. MODULES (76) on my first rack gave me a lead which I held on to throughout for a 407-321 victory. With a 6-2 record I finished second in the group and was promoted to divison A. The room was starting to smell very very badly by now.

At that stage (about 6am) my record for the weekend was 10-6. I therefore set myself the target of winning at least two games in division A, in order to record a 12-12 final total. If the luck had deserted me in the early stages of the event, it came back in spades for the final RR. The fourth game was probably my best of the tournament. After four moves each we'd both managed two bonuses and the score was 210-204 in my favour. A further bonus of TROlLING (62) put me in front and when my opponent chanced the phoney GENUINES* I was able to pull ahead and close out a thrilling game by 445-429. Sadly, my game against the former World Champion was nowhere near as close. I learnt a couple of good new words (EVHOE, ENHALO) but I was never really in it, losing 403-334. I managed one more win in game 23 and decided to celebrate by enjoying a beer with my last game of the tournament. This proved to be a bad decision, as I suffered my worst defeat of the weekend, by 543-329. Neverthless, I'd managed a respectable 4-4 return in division A, taking me to 14-10 for the tournament. My rating is now up to 151, the highest it has ever been!

I honestly didn't feel too tired by the end of it. I think it helped that I had a pretty successful tournament. If I'd been losing most of my games I think it would have been much harder to keep going. It was only on the journey back to London (which was diverted via Cambridge) that it really hit me, and I found myself unable to keep my eyes properly open anymore.

Peterborough Miscellany
First game started: 21/03/09 12.35pm
Last game finished: 22/03/09 2.20pm
Average score per game: 387.25 (I'm pretty disappointed with that)
Number of bonus words played: 35
Highest scoring word: ChROMES: 96
Most played word: AIA (eight times). AUA and AITU also appeared several times.
Number of Red Bulls: 2
Number of bananas: 4
Number of Pro Plus: 0

The hardest moment was the game which I sat out in the second RR, at around 1am. I didn't want to rest or let my energy levels drop in any way, as I thought it would then be very difficult to pick myself up again. Should you ever find yourself in such a situation I can heartily recommend pacing up and down, listening to Kashmir very loudly.

Would I do it again? Probably, yes.

-x-
13 comments|post comment

Words [03 Mar 2009|09:26pm]
Interesting. A couple of you knew what nebbing meant (being nosey) but nobody knew what twagging meant (skipping school). NEBBING is playable in Scrabble. TWAGGING is not.

There is much consternation in the Scrabble world at the moment about whether and how the word list should be updated. There was a suggestion that those of us who play should submit words to be considered for adding to the list. Personally, I think that would be a terrible idea, but should it happen I would be first in line to submit TWAG, meaning to skip school, and all its various inflected forms i.e. TWAGGING, TWAGGED, TWAGGER etc. It was and, to the best of my knowledge, still is used extensively across at least the south of Yorkshire to indicate deliberately not attending school. Synonymous terms (skipping, bunking, wagging etc.) were seldom used, and would have been considered comically upper class by us, I'm sure. (I say, let's bunk double latin this afternoon, Humphrey). Such people probably eat their dinner in the evening.

Of course, I never twagged, because I was a swot at school. And was hated for it by the twaggers.

Another (I think not serious) suggestion for updating the word list has been that we should look to commonly used terms that gather a lot of Google hits, but do not apppear in the word list (todgers, sudoku, slumdog). I really hope that doesn't happen. Definately gathers 149m hits, after all. Googling twag produces interesting results, mind. I'm sure the boastful twaggers of Doncaster wouldn't be pleased to know of that word's alternative, acronymical meaning.

Acronymical should be a word as well.

-x-
4 comments|post comment

[26 Feb 2009|09:22pm]
Poll #1356162
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Without looking it up, what do you think the word 'nebbing' means?

Without looking it up, what do you think the word 'twagging' means?

What do you call your evening meal?

View Answers

Tea
7 (30.4%)

Dinner
14 (60.9%)

Supper
2 (8.7%)



-x-
12 comments|post comment

Scrabb [08 Feb 2009|04:36pm]
A Scrabble update, since I haven't done one for a while. As well as the London Scrabble League, I've also joined the Essex League, playing four rated games a month. Most of the players in that league are rated above me. I won three out of four at last month's fixture, which pushed my rating up to an all-time high of 144.

Yesterday was the latest New Malden one-dayer. From the list of entrants posted the night before, I had thought my rating would just about qualify me to play in the A division. But in fact I just missed the cut, and was instead one of the highest rated in B division. In order to protect my rating, I would have to win four or more likely five games out of six.

Game 1
A blank on my opening rack gave me the easiest of possible starts, as I played dENOTING for 60. My opponent soon whittled down my lead though. I'd picked the second blank but, very frustratingly, I held the racks ADINSS? and ADEINS?* and yet couldn't actually fit a bonus in on a very tight board. Eventually, my opponent cracked and opened up the board a bit, and down went PiNNIES for 84 to restore my lead. The board closed down again. I knew my opponent had the Q, with nowhere to get rid of it, and I made sure it stayed that way. A 421-316 win.

Game 2
That win put me on to the top table for Division B. I struggled with a lack of vowels for the first five moves of this game. Even changing tiles didn't help, but I was able to play the one-vowel bonus STRINGS, for 70 points. My opponent came back strongly though, with scores of 37, 39 and 41, and I was soon behind again. I had a blank and, holding the rack AEFIRT?, there were plenty of bonus options, if I was prepared to open a triple lane. Playing an eight letter bonus through a floating E was safer though. I thought for a while and was very pleased to remember FEATlIER, for 80. I was rewarded by promptly picking up the second blank, along with an X. I was delighted to be able to play RELAXIn for 114, not least since I'd only learnt the word a few days earlier at an Essex League fixture. It was game over really after that and, although I foolishly tried to play the phoney PID, I still won comfortably by 460-381.

Game 3
My opponent's early play of YEX/XI for 54 was countered by my ANODISE for 71. Yet another blank and I played AEROsOL for 72. My lead continued to build, and it became very apparent that my opponent was tile-fishing for a bonus. I'd picked the other blank tile though, and beat him to it with sNARIER for 69. His nice play of ARTLESS for 71 was not enough, and I won by 469-369.

Game 4
Things were going well, but then having picked every single one of the blank tiles so far, I would expect them to. My opponent this time broke that run though, starting with ORDErED for 70 on his first move, then ROMPING for 74 on his third. I was able to score in the 20s and 30s myself, but my opponent was matching me. I had three Ss though, and was able to use two of them to play KISS/ZAGS/NOS for 62, but I was still down by 377-319. In desperation, more than anything else, I played ROPE for 12 to open up a bonus lane near the top. I was pretty sure my opponent held the second blank, and would be able to use it himself. Much to my relief, that didn't happen, and nor did my opponent block it. I had managed to pick the rack ADENRTU. Down went UNRATED/TROPE for 77 to finish the game and give me a 414-385 win. My opponent told me he had only picked the second blank right at the very end.

Game 5
My opponent was the only other undefeated player left in the division. Such games are rarely classics, I find. I managed an early bonus of SOLATINg for 61, but my opponent replied a few moves later with WAITERS. She sought to block a triple lane ending in E by playing HOPE, but unfortunately for her this created a space for my bonus of BAILEES which hadn't existed before. My opponent then used the second blank for just 39 points, and I began to feel my lead was looking secure. I made a couple of silly errors which allowed my opponent to reduce the spread by quite a bit, but I had done enough to win 366-322.

Game 6
The final round was 'king of the hill', with repeats allowed, and so I squared off against the same person I played in game 4. I was on five wins, he was on four. The difference in our spreads meant that he had to beat me by 65 points or more in order to overtake me at the top of the table. I picked an early S but couldn't see an immediate bonus, whereas my opponent was scoring in the 20s and 30s to open up an 80 point lead. Finally, though, I was able to play the bonus DROSERA for 81, and then soon after I had LAX/XI for 53. Because my opponent knew he needed to win and win big, he was perhaps keeping the board more open than he otherwise would have. This only benefitted me though, as I played another bonus, DELETES for 73. My opponent replied immediately with a bonus of his own, TENDRILs for 70. But I'd picked the second black, and could fit in the non-bonus play of dJINNI for 66. In the end I won quite comfortably by 470-326.

So I won division B with a perfect 6/6 record, the second time I've won a B division in the past few months and the first time I've ever come away from a tournament with a perfect record. My rating is now 148! Apart from rated Essex League games, my next tournament will be the 24 games in 24 hours craziness. Very exciting!

-x-

*The best mnemonic I can come up with for describing which letters go with SANDIE to make a seven letter word is 'SCOTSMAN GROWS V. FEARSOME RED BEARD FROM KELP'. That's rubbish, I know. Can you do any better?
8 comments|post comment

[01 Jan 2009|04:56pm]
Happy New Year to one and all.

Last night I went to a 70s funk night, and actually danced.

Tonight we shall be eating PHEASANT.

Poll #1323722
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Yorkshire puddings

View Answers

Suitable accompaniment for any roast dish
32 (74.4%)

Only with roast beef
9 (20.9%)

Never
2 (4.7%)



-x-
9 comments|post comment

Torvill vs Dean [26 Dec 2008|01:17pm]
Very surprising not to see more friendslist comment on this, I have to say. It was the highlight of Christmas Day TV - even better than Corrie (which was very good as well). Spoiler )

Othergates, we (by which I mean mostly Katy) cooked a ridiculously large turkey and only managed to eat one leg each, which is just shameful really. My entry into the 21st century continues as I now have an iPod Nano, and have already started the painstaking process of deciding which CDs are worthy of a permanent new home and which should be cast into ever greater obscurity. Really, though, why did I think it was a good idea to ensure that I owned everything ever produced by King Adora?

-x-
3 comments|post comment

[16 Dec 2008|06:51pm]
KitKat Senses advert update:

It seems someone else has been even more annoyed than me by this advert. The poster at our local train station has had the phrase Sexist nonsense. Give us a break. daubed on top of it. Marvellous.

-x-
2 comments|post comment

Time for a rant [10 Dec 2008|06:41pm]
It's been a while, so it must be about time for another tediously gender-fixated advertising campaign. Step forward Kit Kat, who have erected posters everywhere advertising their Kit Kat Senses chocolate bar, pointing out that it contains only 165 calories, and therefore using the slogan Good will to all women.

Do you see what they did there? In Kitkatland, only those of us with vaginas are interested in chocolate bars that are relatively healthy. In fact, ALL women are intersted in low calorie food. Those of us with penises, on the other hand, clearly have no interest in eating healthily. Why on earth would a man be interested in that?

What we basically have here is the Yorkie '"it's not for girls" advert, without even the thin veneer of tongue in cheek humour which that campaign tried to claim as a justification.

This sort of nonsense really gets up my nose. I'm not laying the blame for this at the door of Kit Kat alone here, but it's just another in a long line of lazy assumptions which buys into the prevailing narrative that men do and are interested 'manly things' and women do and are interested in 'girly things'. Apparently the overlap between the two is so small that now even chocolate bars can be tailored according to your gender.

I despair.

-x-
32 comments|post comment

[01 Dec 2008|07:47pm]
Poll #1307453
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Which of these do you consider 'home'?

View Answers

Your current house or flat
50 (90.9%)

Your parent's or parents' house or flat
1 (1.8%)

I defy your binary because I live with my parents! Hah!
4 (7.3%)



-x-
12 comments|post comment

Songs of the year [28 Nov 2008|11:08pm]
Five
Four
Three
Two
One

-x-
5 comments|post comment

[16 Nov 2008|11:31am]
Stephen!
5 comments|post comment

[16 Nov 2008|09:53am]
Is anybody still watching the X Factor this year? This has to be the most boring year yet. There's usually at least somebody with something a bit different and worth supporting, but I honestly couldn't care less who wins it this year. I think, perhaps, the problem is that the show will probably never be able to top this:



-x-
35 comments|post comment

The big questions [14 Nov 2008|08:36pm]
Poll #1297429
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

When getting off a bus (assuming you're getting off at the front doors) do you thank the dirver?

View Answers

Yes
53 (93.0%)

No
4 (7.0%)



-x-
33 comments|post comment

Beef amnesty [12 Nov 2008|09:17pm]
Hello.

Do you and I currently have beef? Have we ever had beef? Has that left a beefy residue?

If the answer to any of the questions above is yes, do you think we could move on? Can we put it behind us? I do not want to live a life where just going out to the pub to see friends must be preceded by considering a complex web of allegiances. I just don't see the point of this sort of thing anymore.

If I've upset you in the past, I am genuinely sorry. That might seem trite, I know, but please be assured that's not my intention.

If you think we can move on, or if there was nothing wrong in the first place, then there's no need to say anything. If you think we can't, then rather than stewing on it, why not just let rip at me in the comments. Providing I've figured this out correctly, they're screened, and you can post anonymously (although it would make a lot more sense if you identified yourself).

Right.

-x-
post comment

[28 Oct 2008|08:50pm]
I have no idea what Dead Set is. I think I should care, but I can't be bothered to care. I think, about four or five years ago I just accepted that I couldn't really be bothered keeping up with popular culture. You know, music, films, stuff like that. This is both good and bad. But, to my mind, the following is far more important:

Poll #1286874
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Schedule

View Answers

Shedule
20 (48.8%)

Skedule
21 (51.2%)



-x-
34 comments|post comment

Scrabble Club News [24 Oct 2008|09:30pm]
If I can just forestall the flurry of people asking me if I saw HIGNFY. Yes, I did. And yes, it was awesome.

I should really sort myself out with a Scrabble icon.

-x-
4 comments|post comment

Babs [21 Oct 2008|07:40pm]
Poll #1282745 Babs
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Hey boss. What'll it be?

View Answers

Lamb doner
6 (13.3%)

Chicken doner
5 (11.1%)

Lamb shish
12 (26.7%)

Chicken shish
8 (17.8%)

Lamb kofte
3 (6.7%)

Oh yah, er, just a bottle of mineral water thanks awfully.
11 (24.4%)

Sauce?

View Answers

Chili sauce
21 (48.8%)

Garlic sauce
27 (62.8%)

Mayonnaise
6 (14.0%)

Ketchup
7 (16.3%)

Nothing - I like them naked
7 (16.3%)

Salad?

View Answers

Onion
22 (56.4%)

Lettuce
29 (74.4%)

Cabbage
14 (35.9%)

Unfeasibly large slices of cucumber
20 (51.3%)

Tomatoes
22 (56.4%)

Pickled chillies
22 (56.4%)

Pickled chillies (although you never actually eat them, you just don't want the kebab men to think you're soft)
1 (2.6%)

Cheers boss

View Answers

Cheers boss
38 (100.0%)

BONUS QUESTION! When sitting down in a bank of two seats on public transport, where the seat closest to the window is already filled, do you make a big show of only sitting half on the empty seat, perhaps partially turning away from the person who has already sat down, just to make clear that you really hate having to sit next to someone else and you're definitely NOT GAY?

View Answers

Yes
9 (20.0%)

No
36 (80.0%)



Please also give your recommendations for your favourite kebab joint. For my money, Ahmed's BBQ Van in Oxford (just outside Univ) is unbeatable. Simply the best chili sauce, and they always used to throw on a few bonus chips as well. That said, I've come to rather like my local in Lewisham, which I think may be rather misleadingly called The Royal Fish. It's something like that anyway. There's a picture of a winking fish in a crown on the sign.

-x-
47 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]